Cool VL Viewer forum
http://sldev.free.fr/forum/

Not yet a feature request but a question first
http://sldev.free.fr/forum/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=729		 Page 1 of 1
Author:  pierrottin [ 2012-02-16 13:59:48 ]
Post subject:  Not yet a feature request but a question first
Hello,
First i think it will be better to explain certain things before asking my question:
I was (and i'm always) a big fan of Imprudence 1.4.0, i've abandonned it because it don't have meshes and physics (lesser problem). Searching the web i've found the Cool vl Viewer who work greatly on my linux 64 bit but i've always a regret (and it's why i come today for this question):
Is it possible (in a way or another) to have in Cool vl the same communication window and the same mini map as in Imprudence 1.4.0?
Thanks
Author:  Henri Beauchamp [ 2012-02-16 15:41:35 ]
Post subject:  Re: Not yet a feature request but a question first
pierrottin wrote:
Hello,
First i think it will be better to explain certain things before asking my question:
I was (and i'm always) a big fan of Imprudence 1.4.0, i've abandonned it because it don't have meshes and physics (lesser problem). Searching the web i've found the Cool vl Viewer who work greatly on my linux 64 bit but i've always a regret (and it's why i come today for this question):
Is it possible (in a way or another) to have in Cool vl the same communication window
Reply already given in this thread and this other thread...

Quote:
and the same mini map as in Imprudence 1.4.0?
No, and not planning to change the mini-map... The Cool VL Viewer got a separate Radar floater and therefore doesn't need Imprudence's combined mini-map/radar.
Author:  pierrottin [ 2012-02-17 09:54:51 ]
Post subject:  Re: Not yet a feature request but a question first
Hello Henri,
For your first answer i'm sorry but there is nothing related to my question in the two threads indicated by you.
About your second answer, well it's clear enough.
Author:  Henri Beauchamp [ 2012-02-17 12:53:46 ]
Post subject:  Re: Not yet a feature request but a question first
pierrottin wrote:
For your first answer i'm sorry but there is nothing related to my question in the two threads indicated by you.
The replies deal with how to make the Cool VL Viewer's communication window more v1.2x (and Imprudence, and Phoenix, etc) alike. I can't make a more accurate reply to a vague and inaccurate question...

In any case the Cool VL Viewer's UI will NOT be changed to be made more Imprudence (or Phoenix, or any viewer) alike. The UI is and will always be what it already was on the very first release of the Cool VL Viewer (first public release was 1.18.4.3, but my first (private) viewer dates back from v1.17 days...): one of the key features of my viewer is UI stability.
Author:  pierrottin [ 2012-02-19 01:22:07 ]
Post subject:  Re: Not yet a feature request but a question first
Henri Beauchamp wrote:
pierrottin wrote:
For your first answer i'm sorry but there is nothing related to my question in the two threads indicated by you.
The replies deal with how to make the Cool VL Viewer's communication window more v1.2x (and Imprudence, and Phoenix, etc) alike. I can't make a more accurate reply to a vague and inaccurate question...

In any case the Cool VL Viewer's UI will NOT be changed to be made more Imprudence (or Phoenix, or any viewer) alike. The UI is and will always be what it already was on the very first release of the Cool VL Viewer (first public release was 1.18.4.3, but my first (private) viewer dates back from v1.17 days...): one of the key features of my viewer is UI stability.

UI stability???
not sure as you...the last release crash more often than the others
and...stability doesn't means immobility
also if you found my questions vague or inaccurate....learn to read
Author:  Henri Beauchamp [ 2012-02-19 08:54:02 ]
Post subject:  Re: Not yet a feature request but a question first
pierrottin wrote:
UI stability???
not sure as you...the last release crash more often than the others
If you encounter crashes, report them. "UI stability" doesn't have anything to do with this however. It simply means that the UI doesn't vary from one release to the next.

Quote:
and...stability doesn't means immobility
If you don't like it, I encourage you to move on and use another viewer.

Quote:
also if you found my questions vague or inaccurate....learn to read
Learn to write and to describe properly your issues, but again, you are welcome to go see elsewhere and go search for greener pastures if you are not happy !
Page 1 of 1 All times are UTC
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
https://www.phpbb.com/